Clinician (Oncology / Hematology)

What you'll do

This is trial-physician judgement applied to AI evaluation. You write and review evaluation tasks built from Clinical Study Reports, periodic safety reports and regulatory correspondence in oncology and haematology, and the questions you are asking of the material are the ones a medical monitor or DSMB member asks:

• Are the efficacy and safety conclusions clinically defensible, and do the endpoints and effect sizes mean what the text claims?
• Is the dose escalation, dose-limiting toxicity handling and dose modification sound?
• Are adverse events graded and attributed correctly, and do the patient narratives hold together?
• Does the benefit-risk reasoning survive new events, and is the described management realistic?

You flag content that is clinically implausible or internally inconsistent while leaving legitimate clinical variation alone, and you write structured, guideline-based rationales aimed at a non-clinical reader. That audience matters: the people using your output are engineers, so the explanation has to stand without shared medical context.

Who fits

• Specialist registration or board certification in medical oncology and/or haematology, with at least five years of post-training clinical experience
• Direct trial involvement as investigator or sub-investigator, or sponsor-side as medical monitor, safety physician or clinical development physician
• Fluency with CTCAE grading, response criteria (RECIST, Lugano, IMWG, iwCLL, ELN) and endpoints (ORR, DoR, PFS, OS, MRD)
• Hands-on work with protocols, investigator brochures, CSRs, safety narratives or DSMB/IDMC materials
• Clear, structured writing for non-clinical readers

Medical monitoring or medical director roles, IDMC, DSMB or adjudication committee work, and a publication record on trial manuscripts are all pluses, as is any exposure to AI-assisted clinical review tools.

What it pays

$160–200/hour, micro1's published figure and the highest among its clinical listings in this set. The band is relatively tight. No compensation structure, weekly hours or duration is stated. For comparison, micro1's Pharmacovigilance Expert listing on overlapping documents (DSURs, PSURs) pays $70–80 because it does not require a practising specialist.

Worth knowing

Good:

• Top-end clinical pay with a narrow band
• Thirty openings, flagged high demand
• Both academic investigators and sponsor-side physicians qualify
• Specialist registration outside the US is accepted ("registration or board certification")

Less good:

• A demanding bar: specialist certification plus trial experience
• No hours, duration or pay structure published
• Posted two months ago; check it is still open
• Contractor engagement: no benefits, no notice period, your own tax to manage
• The customer is not named

About this listing

Posted by micro1 on its own jobs portal and read on 24 September 2026. The $160–200/hour band, thirty openings, certification and trial requirements are its own published text. Location is given only as remote with no country restriction, so eligibility is left open. Payment terms and schedule are not published on the listing. See micro1.