Skip to content
Labeling Jobs

Specialist vs generalist AI training jobs: which pays more

Platform comparison · 1 week ago

Specialist AI training jobs pay more on average: a $75 an hour median against $50 for the general field, across 699 listings on this site. But language and audio specialisms pay less than generalist work, and the best generalist roles reach $140 to $200.

The short answer

Specialist AI training jobs pay more than generalist ones on average, but not every specialism does, and the best generalist roles out-earn the weakest specialist ones. This comparison uses the 699 listings on this site as of 29 September 2026, and compares the site's General & Data Collection field against every other field.

The headline numbers

The 67 hourly listings in the general field have a median of $50 an hour (the midpoint of each listing's range), and half of them fall between $35 and $60.

The 597 hourly listings in every other field have a median of $75, with a middle half of $45.50–100. Take out languages and audio, which are specialist in name but pay less, and the remaining 445 professional listings have a median of $80 and a middle half of $65–115.

So a typical specialist listing pays around $25–30 an hour more than a typical generalist one.

One template, four tiers

The cleanest comparison on the board is Mercor's Application Users family, which runs the same job (recording yourself using a piece of software) at different rates depending on who you are:

TierExamplePay
GeneralistPhotoshop on Windows$30–40
STEMMATLAB on Windows$45–55
CodeVS Code on macOS$55–65
ProfessionalsExcel on macOS$60–70

Same platform, same task shape: professional or technical tools pay up to twice the generalist rate.

Where generalists do well

The general field is not uniformly low. micro1's AI Domain Expert listing paid $140–200 and its AI Trainer $100–180 before both closed. Mercor's Generalist Expert pays $50–70, which is more than most language and audio work. "Generalist" in these listings means no single field, not no bar: the work is writing, research and evaluation that has to hold up.

The low end of the general field is data collection: micro1's data annotator listings at $6–10 and its video-recording roles at $6–20.

Where specialists do not

Languages & Linguistics (median $27.50) and Audio & Voice ($28) are both below the general field. AI Safety & Evaluation sits level with it at $50. What lifts a specialist listing is a credential that is hard to find, which is why Health & Medicine leads at $140 and Law, Policy & Security follows at about $101.

The trade-off

Specialist roles pay more but are narrower. A listing for a US-licensed dermatologist or a BigLaw litigator is closed to almost everyone, while generalist listings on Mercor and micro1 are open to a wide pool.

If you have a professional background, apply to the specialist listing first; the rate difference is large and, on this board, consistent.

More on AI training pay

Questions

Do specialist AI training jobs pay more than generalist ones?
On average, yes. The 67 hourly listings in the general field on this site have a median of $50 an hour, against $75 for the 597 listings in every other field and $80 for professional fields excluding languages and audio.
Which specialist AI training jobs pay less than generalist work?
Languages and linguistics (median $27.50 an hour) and audio and voice (median $28) both sit below the general field's $50 median. AI safety and evaluation is level with it at $50.
Can generalist AI training jobs pay well?
Some do. micro1's AI Domain Expert listing pays $140 to $200 an hour and its AI Trainer $100 to $180, and Mercor's Generalist Expert pays $50 to $70.

Platforms covered here

Put this into practice

Every listing shows its pay and who it is open to.